About the Post

Author Information

URA cracks down on misuse of factory units

THE Government has wasted no time in tackling a thorny problem that had sprung up over the wrong type of tenants using factory space to get cheap rent.

The prompt action seems to have been set in train by a no-nonsense blog post by National Development Minister Khaw Boon Wan last week.

He suggested that sharp practice by developers and their marketing agents could be prompting unwitting investors to buy small industrial units thinking they would be easy to rent.

This belief was fuelled by the taking up of such space by tenants who were technically not meant to be there,and who have been bending the rules to get lower rent than would otherwise apply.

Earlier media reports cited examples such as tuition centres, retail outlets and even churches – adding that the higher demand could drive up rents too.

In response, the Urban Redevelopment Authority (URA) has made changes to ensure that buyers are not misled into buying industrial units without knowing the possible restrictions on their uses.

A URA circular sent to developers and lawyers states that developers selling non-residential properties – shops, offices and industrial units – must from Friday insert, in the option to purchase and the sale-and-purchase agreement, a clause stipulating clearly the approved use of the unit sold.

For instance, an industrial unit’s use could be specified as for a factory or showroom, according to what was stated in the URA’s approval for the project.

Currently, the unit can be loosely stated as for ‘industrial use’, and buyers unfamiliar with the sector may be unclear as to what sort of tenants are allowed.

This clause should be contained in a side letter made known to the buyer before the booking fee is accepted – or at the time the option to purchase is issued.

Experts say that as this will allow buyers to be aware of the approved use of the unit purchased, they cannot subsequently argue that they are unclear about the scope of uses allowed. This will minimise potential disputes, they add.

Mr Lee Liat Yeang, a partner at Rodyk & Davidson’s Real Estate Practice Group, said the change would alert buyers specifically to the fact that they cannot change the approved use without prior approval from the authorities. They will also know the actual approved use of the project as early as possible in the buying process.

‘In the past, very often the buyer is only aware of the approved use… at the time of receipt of the sale agreement from the lawyers. This is after the option has been issued, which means the buyer has already put down a 5 per cent deposit,’ Mr Lee added.

An industry observer, who declined to be named, noted that with the residential measures diverting investors to the industrial segment, more housing agents are streaming into the market. Some of them might push industrial units aggressively to investors even though they are unfamiliar with the rules governing the sector.

Soilbuild managing director Lim Chap Huat said that he has always told his marketing agents to be upfront with buyers of his industrial projects.

He is supportive of the change, as investors need to be aware of what exactly they are purchasing, especially with some artist’s impressions making new industrial projects look just like shopping malls.

A URA spokesman said the changes do not apply to tenancy agreements, as the leasing of completed properties does not fall under the Sale of Commercial Properties Act, which allows for changes to sales agreements of uncompleted industrial properties.

For prospective tenants, URA has been actively working with the Council of Estate Agents and developers to ensure the accuracy of marketing materials for such industrial premises so that end-users, including tenants, are not misled on the approved use,’ the spokesman added.

Mr Khaw put rogue industrial tenants and landlords on notice in his blog entry last Friday, noting that tenants are running some office and non-industrial activities in industrial buildings.

He also noted the emergence of shoebox factories of as small as 50 sq m to 80 sq m, likely too small to accommodate genuine industrial activities.

Still, many investors are attracted by the smaller quantums of typically less than $500,000 for shoebox factory units.

The proper use of industrial space includes manufacturing, warehousing and production. Certain types of e-businesses, such as IT infrastructure and software development, are also allowed.

There are exceptions. For instance, childcare centres and furniture showrooms are allowed, as they support the main industrial activities. Broadly speaking, they may occupy about 40 per cent of the industrial development.

Source: The Straits Times – 20 March 2012

Tags: , , , , , , ,

No comments yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: